ELLE Deep Dive: The Untold Origin Story Of Dyson Supersonic

The hair dryer didn’t evolve. For over half a century, it stayed noisy, heavy, top-heavy, and worse, damaging. It was the one tool that touched hair most often, and yet cared the least about it. Until one man, known for cleaning the air, decided to change the way we used it.

In 2016, Sir James Dyson launched the Supersonic, a hair dryer that looked nothing like a hair dryer. The motor wasn’t in the head. The heat wasn’t extreme. The sound wasn’t deafening. And for the first time, airflow became a science, acoustically engineered, digitally balanced, and placed with intention.

But this isn’t the story of a product. It’s the story of an idea, and how five years of development, over 600 prototypes, and access to a proprietary digital motor changed the beauty industry from the inside out. For the first time in India, Dyson has opened the vaults to ELLE Beauty. This is the Supersonic, seen through its earliest design sketches, its discarded test rigs, its mushroom-derived formulations, and the personal convictions of the man who decided hair health was worth the fight.

It began, as most Dyson projects do, with frustration. The frustration of burnt ends. Of loud, top-heavy dryers that pulled at the wrist and blasted heat like punishment. Beauty tools that, despite being a staple in every woman’s routine, had barely evolved.

In a quiet lab far from the runways and retail counters, Dyson’s engineers began a project that had nothing to do with beauty as we knew it. This was about mechanics. Weight. Air. Heat. Protection. And the question was simple: What if a hair dryer could actually care for hair?

When a Category Stops Evolving

Before Dyson, hair dryers were clunky tools of convenience. Introduced to the consumer market in the 1920s and standardised by the ’60s, they carried the same flaws for decades: loud, damaging, inefficient. The motor sat in the head, making the design top-heavy. Heat was delivered with force, not control. Shine was often an afterthought.

There was a quiet acceptance in the industry that this was the norm. Until Dyson entered with its signature impatience for bad design. “I didn’t understand why something that touched your hair every day hadn’t changed in fifty years,” says Sir James Dyson. “And more importantly, why it was still hurting hair. It was bad engineering pretending to be normal.”

He says this without drama. Just a quiet disdain for lazy design and the conviction that everything is figure-outable—if you care enough to obsess.

How Dyson Got Personal with Hair

Hair, by Dyson’s own admission, wasn’t an obvious entry point. The brand was known for high-velocity vacuums, fans, and purifiers. But the logic, like all Dyson projects, was simple: something was broken, and no one else was fixing it.

What they discovered early on was that traditional dryers weren't just inefficient, they were actively harmful. The heat was too hot. The weight was wrongly distributed. And worst of all, the motor’s location in the head made balance impossible. Salon stylists knew this pain intimately. So did women who’d blow-dried their hair every morning for decades.

To rethink the dryer, Dyson’s team did what most R&D labs wouldn’t. They enrolled in beauty school. They learned how to blow-dry. They studied cuticles, grip strain, and hydration loss. They built robotic rigs that mimicked human drying patterns. Then they rebuilt the motor.

The Dyson digital motor V9 is only 27mm wide, weighs 49 grams, and spins at up to 110,000 revolutions per minute. Its size meant it could sit in the handle, not the head, creating the kind of balance that stylists had long been denied. Its heat sensors monitored airflow temperature 30 times per second. It didn’t just avoid burning hair. It protected shine. “That motor changed everything,” Dyson tells me, holding up the tiny cylinder like a surgical instrument. “The breakthrough wasn’t just in airflow, it was in where we put the power. That’s when it became a Dyson product.”

As someone who’s held nearly every premium dryer in the market, I expected refinement. But what I found in the process sketches was something else entirely, rigour, frustration, mathematical madness. Dyson didn’t beautify the process. They engineered it with almost surgical detail.

The Sketchbooks Never Meant to Be Seen

This access to the archives tells a deeper story. The earliest prototypes weren’t beautiful. They were raw. Test rigs. Ergonomic experiments. Blocks of weight meant to mimic balance. Airflow tubes soldered into primitive frames. But they were functional, and that function told the engineers where beauty would eventually live.

James Dyson keeps all his sketchbooks. Every engineer at Dyson does. Lined up on shelves, they chart a lineage of trial and iteration. For the Supersonic, those sketches contain everything: the shape of the airflow curve, the adjustments made to grip, the scaling of attachments, the false starts.

None of this has been shown to an Indian publication before. For the first time in India, ELLE Beauty was granted access to these archives. They include early design frames, test rigs soldered together by hand, airflow channelling diagrams, and a sketch of the Supersonic’s curved nozzle dated months before launch.

You see scribbled margin notes, circles around airflow obstructions, and alternate handle placements that were scrapped in favour of symmetry. These aren’t illustrations. They’re forensic evidence of the birth of something entirely new. “There’s beauty in the struggle,” James says. “You have to make mistakes. You have to make ugly things before they get better.” It’s a surprisingly poetic answer for an engineer. But perhaps that’s what made the Supersonic feel so different, it wasn’t trying to be pretty. It was trying to be right.

The Supersonic r™ and the Needs of the Wrist

When Dyson released the Supersonic r™, the update wasn’t about aesthetic polish. It was about professional realities. The r™ is 30% smaller and 20% lighter, with RFID-enabled attachments that auto-adjust heat and airflow depending on hair type. It uses laminar airflow instead of turbulence and instant cooling to lock in shape without damage.

These weren’t cosmetic upgrades. They were occupational ones.

Dyson’s team worked with nearly 700 stylists to understand their routines: how often they switch angles, how much arm fatigue they carry by noon, how critical instant cooling is when precision matters. The r™ answered those needs, and then entered salons as a tool built not just for clients, but for the people holding it.

And the best part, it didn’t arrive with a marketing thunderclap. It slipped quietly into salons, already adopted by the people it was designed for. Behind these specs is a design philosophy not meant to impress consumers. They were solving for professionals who work with hair, like artists and athletes. The Supersonic r™ is their studio-grade tool.

How Supersonic Changed the Conversation

Since the Supersonic’s launch, every major beauty tool brand has shifted focus: heat protection is now non-negotiable. Motor placement is no longer a footnote. Shine, balance, and noise are part of the value equation.

What was once marketed as “fast drying” is now being reconsidered as “safe styling.”

Dyson didn’t just set a new standard. It quietly invalidated the old one.

The Future is Already in the Sketchbook

When I ask James what’s next, he doesn’t answer directly. Instead, he smiles and says, “The sketches will tell you before I do.”

In that moment, I get it. The Supersonic isn’t just a product. It’s a living archive. Every iteration, every grip adjustment, every airflow experiment—it’s all there, still expanding. Beauty tools are no longer static. They’re in motion. And Dyson is already sketching the next inflexion point.

Somewhere in that quiet lab, another ugly prototype is being built. And if history is any proof, it’s going to change everything again.

Also Read:

Stop! 5 Hair Wash Habits That Are Ruining Your Hair

How To Choose The Best Hairstyles For Your Face Shape Across All Face Types