/elle-india/media/agency_attachments/2024/12/12/2024-12-12t050944592z-2024-11-18t092336231z-czebsydrcd4dzd67f1wr.webp)
/elle-india/media/media_files/2025/04/04/e4FHhux3vPBUItFVTVQf.png)
For Gen Z, dating is no longer about neatly defined labels—it’s about fluidity, individuality, and self-exploration. Traditional terms such as liking a boyfriend or girlfriend are being swapped for situationships, talking stages, and exclusive-but-not-official dynamics. While some love the freedom of label-free connections, others feel the lack of clarity can lead to confusion, mixed signals, and emotional burnout.
Love, Actually...
Social media, dating apps, and a shift toward emotional well-being have also shaped how Gen Z approaches romance. Many prioritise personal growth over traditional timelines, choosing authenticity over expectations. But with this newfound freedom, one question remains—are labels really outdated, or do they still matter? Or is it more crucial now than before to define the relationship?
Decoding Gen Z Dating: The Terms That Have Been Around
- Situationship: The go-to term for those who want the perks of a relationship without the commitment. It’s more than casual but not quite official—an undefined, yet something kind of connection.
- Talking Stage: The pre-dating phase where you’re feeling things out, seeing if it could turn into something real or, more often than not, realizing it’s time to run the other way.
- Hard-Launching/Soft-Launching: Social media and marking your social presence is the way to stay relevant for Gen Z. When it comes to revieling a relationship online, hard launch=full reveal, soft launch=subtle hints.
- Roster: A rotation of people you’re casually dating at the same time, allowing for exploration without the pressure of full commitment.
- Benching: This one stings, keeping someone on standby while pursuing other options.
- Ghosting: If vanishing without a trace is your specialty, this one's for you- disappearing without a word after dating or talking.
- Breadcrumbing: Keeping someone hooked with just enough attention, but never fully committing. If this sounds familiar, you might be caught in the cycle of breadcrumbing.
The Shift Away from Traditional Labels
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly when or how the shift began, but one thing is clear, our perspective on traditional dating has completely changed. Many of us grew up immersed in fairy tales about finding 'The One' and spent countless hours watching rom-coms that painted love as a grand, all-consuming journey. But fast forward to today, dating looks vastly different.
With the rise of situationships, talking stages, and commitment-free connections, the once-clear roadmap of love has become increasingly blurred. Some see this as a sign of progress—embracing flexibility, personal growth, and rejecting outdated societal expectations. Others, however, worry that we’re not evolving forward but rather drifting away from core values like loyalty and commitment.
Labels create expectations, which can be fair, but they don’t change intentions. If someone isn’t committed, a label won’t fix that.
"I define my relationship status based on how the other person sees it. If I’m truly interested, I’d consider us dating. I’ve avoided labels when we weren’t on the same page, it’s not just about feelings but also shared values and future plans. I feel that it's enough of labels. Such labels create expectations, which may seem fair on one hand, but they also don’t change intentions. If someone isn’t committed, a label won’t fix that. Every relationship is different, and forcing a definition doesn’t always make things clear," says Arushi Shah.
So, are we modernising romance to fit our generation’s needs, or are we unknowingly making it harder to build deep, lasting relationships? That is definitely food for thought.
How Social Media And Swipes Stepped Into The Game
/elle-india/media/media_files/2025/04/04/NEh8pkqgM9IfSTIQh0IL.png)
Decades ago, relationships often formed organically - through mutual friends, chance encounters, or shared experiences. People invested in the connections they built without the constant temptation of what else is out there. Today, if labels are being put aside, social media is stepping onto the turf, redefining things for folks, giving them more options and making it easier than meet new people. The swipe culture has created the illusion that something better is always one click away. If you aren't fitting into the dating terms, simply start looking again.
"This is both good and bad. While people are exposed to endless options, many also keep searching for the next best thing, often leading to dissatisfaction," notes Peter Fernandes.
He adds, "Many of us are just twenty-somethings still figuring things out, yet generations before us were making life-altering decisions at that age, so having a clear mind sans labels, helps."
No Labels, No Emotions
Is it liberating? Is it confusing? Or are we just emotionally detached? For some, a label is just a word, while for others, it represents commitment, clarity, and emotional connection. Without labels, relationships can feel open-ended, free from pressure but also lacking definition.
For some, this fluidity removes expectations, making dating feel light and exciting. But for others, it creates uncertainty, leaving them questioning where they stand and how much emotional investment is too much. Without a clear commitment, is it easier to walk away? Or does avoiding labels actually protect us from the emotional risks of love?
"The world feels too open now, making it harder to appreciate what we have. Labels like situationship or exclusive partner have blurred commitment, making relationships feel less serious. Dating once meant being all in, driven by love. Now, these terms encourage casual connections, reducing emotional depth and making love feel more detached and less meaningful," says Zarah Mehta.
As modern dating shifts away from traditional structures, the question remains—are we embracing a healthier, more flexible approach, or are we just afraid to commit?
Where The Modern Dating Scene Stands
/elle-india/media/media_files/2025/04/04/IxiUx9BzSwMtnG6aRAjF.png)
In the world of where people are categorised by red flags and green flags while redefining love, commitment and labels, the challenge lies in whether we can restore deeper connections or run in the opposite direction. With more people choosing independence in relationships, self-growth is taking precedence, but it also raises concerns about whether this shift is leading to emotional detachment and making Gen Z forget about the idea of putting tags.
With a rise in open-ended dynamics, personal freedom outweighs traditional labels. While this allows for self-discovery, it also fosters a cycle of uncertainty. Here, terms like 'breadcrumbing', 'ghosting', 'love bombing' and 'situationships' add to the sense of complexity.
“Half the generation really wants to be in a committed relationship, the other half doesn't care. But many people are still comfortable with the idea of not having a label at all as opposed to getting stuck in a bad relationship because of the label and the expectactions attached to it. It is not wrong to say that Gen Z is the most complicated and confused generation,” says Ananya Varma.
It's a mixed bag. As the lines between love, loyalty, and commitment blur, the role of labels in modern romance is more confusing than ever. For some, labels offer clarity and emotional security, for others, they feel restrictive or outdated. Whether this shift in defining relationships is deepening our connections or making them more fragile is still up for debate.